New veterinary hospitals lose staff to hiring systems that don't exist, not to bad candidates

New veterinary hospitals lose staff because owner-DVMs hire whoever shows up first instead of building a repeatable system before the first interview. The equipment arrives on time, the financing closes, the floor plan works, then the practice loses technicians because it never defined what success looks like or who fits the culture it's trying to build.

The pattern repeats across startup practices: hire reactively to fill the immediate gap, skip the structured onboarding because the schedule is already underwater, lose the hire, repeat. What looks like a staffing problem is a systems problem, and it starts before the first résumé arrives.

The mistake happens in the planning phase, not the hiring phase

Most new owners write a job description that reads like a bulleted list of tasks (restrain patients, run lab work, answer phones) then wonder why the applicants who respond don't stay. The job posting never sold a vision, never named the practice's core values, and never defined what success in the role looks like beyond showing up and completing chores.

Dr. Peter Weinstein, writing in Today's Veterinary Business, says the hiring filter has to be built before the job ad goes live: write down three to five core values and define what they look like in practice, not as generic placeholders like "excellence" or "compassion" but as actionable guidelines that dictate daily behavior. If a core value is psychological safety, the operational definition is "we address mistakes constructively without public blame, and every team member is encouraged to ask questions." If an applicant has strong technical skills but dismisses those values in the interview, they will toxify the workplace culture, and the cost of that turnover comes due faster in a startup practice that hasn't built the resilience of an established one.

The job description itself has to sell the mission and outline benchmarks for success, not list tasks. Modern job seekers research employers before they apply, so the practice website needs a careers page that highlights the mission, the commitment to predictable scheduling and work-life balance, and the benefits package. If the practice is an acquisition under new ownership, the social media channels need to signal a fresh, positive chapter under the new leadership, not sit dormant with outdated content.

The interview process that reduces impulsive hires

The practices that survive the staffing chaos use a multi-stage interview process that screens for emotional intelligence and cultural fit, not technical competence alone. Weinstein recommends four stages: a résumé screen that checks for spelling, grammar, work longevity, and congruity between the résumé and the job application; a Zoom call to gauge personality and let the candidate ask their own questions; an in-person interview that screens for emotional intelligence, which you can't teach; and a paid working interview that lets both sides assess cultural and functional fit.

The working interview is where the pattern diverges between practices that retain staff and practices that churn through it. Pay the candidate a competitive hourly rate for their time. Watch whether they jump in to help wash bowls or sweep without being asked. Give your existing team 15 minutes alone with the candidate, then ask them afterward whether this person elevated the team's energy or drained it. If the team flags a cultural mismatch, trust their instincts. They're the ones who will work alongside this hire every day, and they can spot a poor fit faster than the owner-DVM conducting the interview.

Weinstein's advice: hire for emotional intelligence and personality, then train the needed technical skills. The inverse (hiring for technical skills and hoping the personality fits) is the path to the turnover cycle that delays profitability.

The onboarding system new practices skip

The second pattern: new practices throw the hire onto the floor on their first day because the schedule is already short-staffed, and the hire experiences immediate anxiety and leaves early. Weinstein says onboarding should last 90 days to a full year and is different from orientation, which is a one-to-two-day event focused on paperwork and compliance. Onboarding integrates the employee into the culture, workflow, and long-term vision, and skipping it because you need the help today costs you the hire tomorrow.

Day one should have no clinical duties. Focus on administrative onboarding, a hospital tour, introductions, and a welcome lunch with the entire team. Provide a written training schedule so the new hire knows what to expect. Make it a joyous occasion with welcome signs and hospital swag. This first impression sets the tone for the relationship.

Days two through four introduce the practice management software, safety protocols, and standard operating procedures, with the new hire shadowing a veteran team member without the pressure of performing tasks independently. Week two allows the employee to begin performing basic tasks under direct supervision of a designated trainer or mentor, and the week ends with a 15-minute check-in to clear up any early confusion.

The practices that retain staff use a formal 30-60-90-day roadmap that outlines explicit milestones for every role, not a vague "see one, do one, teach one" approach. Weinstein recommends brief reviews throughout the first three months on a consistent schedule, so the new hire knows where they stand and the practice catches misalignment before it calcifies into a resignation.

If you're planning to open your own practice or you're managing turnover in an existing one, subscribe to VeterinaryPracticeNow.

The retention math new owners underestimate

New practice owners underestimate the timeline for building retention systems, and the team fractures before the systems solidify. Retention in new practices hinges on defining roles and compensation structure before the first hire, not after the first resignation. The practices that survive staffing chaos build retention systems during the planning phase, not after the first wave of turnover.

The retention levers Weinstein names: predictable scheduling, psychological safety, clear competencies tied to advancement, and a culture where people want to stay long-term. Those aren't perks you add after the practice is profitable. They're the operational foundation you build during the planning phase, before the first interview, or you spend years replacing the same positions over and over.

Our read: whether the new practice defines its core values and writes its training roadmap during the construction phase, or whether it treats staffing as a checklist item to handle after the doors open. The practices that do the former retain staff. The practices that do the latter lose staff faster, and the cost of that turnover is what delays profitability and can threaten the practice's survival.

← Back to the Newsdesk