Today's Veterinary Practice publishes a mixed animal issue with no practice model to support it

Today's Veterinary Practice published a mixed animal practice edition with clinical resources on potbellied pigs, goats, and equine pain management, according to the journal's editorial introduction.

The consensus reading: the journal's editor frames the issue as addressing "unique challenges" with "practical educational resources" and "applicable tips and tools" for vets who see multiple species, responding to what the editor describes as "an increasing need for care as some of these animals take on pet roles in areas where fewer veterinarians exist."

What the framing leaves out

How to treat a vomiting potbellied pig or a blocked goat is the easy part. Whether a small animal practice can profitably offer mixed animal services at all is harder, and the issue does not address it. Staffing ratios, liability coverage, the time cost of looking up a protocol mid-appointment, and whether the fee schedule can support the longer appointments these cases require decide that.

A goat with neurologic signs is not a routine wellness visit. It is a species the associate DVM last touched in vet school, if at all, requiring a reference check, a call to a colleague, or a longer exam to avoid a missed diagnosis. That time has to come from somewhere. Either the appointment runs over and the schedule backs up, or the practice blocks a longer slot and charges accordingly. Adding a species that requires more time without adjusting the fee or the staffing model turns the case into a margin question.

The liability piece is harder still. A small animal practice's malpractice policy may differ in coverage for different species, and the associate DVM fielding the call for a fainting goat may not know whether the practice's policy covers it. The owner-DVM deciding whether to market mixed animal services has to price that coverage into the decision. The journal's issue gives the clinical protocol but not the insurance conversation.

Who benefits from the clinical-only framing

Veterinary schools promote the "real doctors treat more than one species" line because it positions graduates as broadly competent, which helps with accreditation standards and recruitment. The reality the journal's editor acknowledges: many graduates find their niche in one to two species.

Publishing a mixed animal issue with expert clinical advice but no practice-model guidance keeps the multispecies ideal alive without addressing whether a small animal practice can actually offer it profitably. It lets the school and the journal celebrate the mixed animal veterinarian without addressing the structural reasons the business model is harder.

The case for the contrarian read

We are not arguing the clinical resources are bad. A potbellied pig protocol written by an expert is useful if you see potbellied pigs. We are arguing that clinical knowledge is one piece, and the practice model is another. The associate DVM who wants to treat the backyard flock needs the clinical reference, yes, but also needs to know whether the practice's fee schedule, staffing, and liability coverage support taking the case, and that decision belongs to the owner-DVM, not the associate.

The risk in our read: we could be wrong if client demand for nontraditional pet care is strong enough that practices can charge a premium for mixed animal services and the margin works. But the journal's own framing, that mixed animal practice is driven by "an increasing need for care" in "areas where fewer veterinarians exist," suggests the demand is coming from underserved markets, not from clients willing to pay a specialist premium. In that case, the clinical resources help the veterinarian but do not solve the business problem.

If your practice is deciding whether to add species, subscribe to VeterinaryPracticeNow.

What the issue does deliver

The journal compiled expert advice on vomiting potbellied pigs, blocked goats, goats with neurologic signs, and equine pain management, plus guidance on maximizing veterinary technician use in mixed animal settings. For the veterinarian already working in a mixed animal practice, rural large animal work or a practice that has solved the staffing and fee-schedule questions, the issue is a reference worth keeping. The clinical protocols are species-specific and written by practitioners who treat those species regularly, which is harder to find than the equivalent small animal resources.

For the small animal associate DVM fielding a call about a backyard chicken, the issue gives the clinical starting point but not the answer to whether the practice should take the case. That answer depends on the practice's business model, and the journal does not address it.

For the owner-DVM

If you are deciding whether to market mixed animal services, the clinical resources are table stakes. You need them, but they do not decide whether you can adjust the fee schedule, the appointment length, the staffing ratio, and the liability coverage to support the longer, less-routine cases these species require. Run those numbers before you add "we see exotics" to the website, because the clinical protocol does not pay for the extra time.

If you already run a mixed animal practice, the issue is a consolidated reference for cases you see regularly, and the species-specific expert advice is harder to find elsewhere. The journal's framing, that mixed animal practice is a response to client demand in underserved areas, matches what we hear from rural and exurban practices, where the alternative is no care at all.

For the associate DVM

If a client calls about a potbellied pig or a goat and you have not treated one since vet school, ask the owner-DVM whether the practice's fee schedule and liability policy support taking the case before you book the appointment. The clinical resources help you treat the animal once it is in the exam room, but they do not tell you whether the practice should take it in the first place. That is a business decision, not a clinical one, and it belongs to the person who owns the practice.

If you want to build a mixed animal skill set, the issue gives species-specific protocols from practitioners who treat those species regularly, which is more useful than the generalist textbook most of us used in school. But the skill set is only valuable if the practice's business model supports using it.

← Back to the Newsdesk